Alex views the major difference or point of conflict as that between the creativity of Roman and Igor and business sense of Henry and Dana. This will allow the group to develop focus and influence, and motivate them to greater effort. For Henry the leader was that person who at the time had the most energy to give to an issue.
There was a lot of friction between them. Team members have established strong supporting, empathizing, and harmonizing relationship. The lack of a sound team process resulted in no written business plan with the deadline less than three weeks away.
They have come together in order to complete a task. From the case, we also see examples of bad collaborative behavior between Sasha and Dana. Team members in this stage exhibit a sense of mutual responsibility and concern for one another as they carry out their work pg.
The root of the problem is that the company culture is not adaptive. Alex could be that candidate. Dana will present an idea knowing Sasha will disagree. The MGI Team meetings and discussion styles are not effective, failing to produce positive results.
An important recommendation for Henry would include establishing expectations and boundaries for the group. This is a period of high emotionality and tension among the group members. For Alex, he views the differences simply as people wanting to be thorough, and coming from different experiences and skill levels.
All of us were happy to be working together and we were motivated, but certain allegiances cropped up, basically around HBS versus the Russians.
Roman believes Dana takes a very broad view of things, that Sasha also views Dana this way, and that Dana believes Sasha simply as a salesperson. The blurring roles caused to team to remain inefficient.
The decision facing the group was a non-programmed decision and thus more appropriate to be decided by a group rather than an individual.Henry Tam and the MGI Team Case Characteristics of group formation and team processes are highlighted in the Harvard Business School case of Henry Tam and the Music Games International (MGI) Team.
The MGI Team Case Study is a lesson in the difficulties faced by a team with inadequate leadership.
Indications of possible problems in the group’s functioning were evident even before the MGI team’s first meeting. Henry Tam, a second-year Harvard MBA student, who joins an aspiring start-up company and a fellow classmate to enter the school's business plan contest.
The founders of the company are two internationally accomplished musicians and a Harvard MBA, all Russian, who are trying to create, produce, and sell a unique computer-based music.
Henry Tam and the MGI Team Case - Main Managerial Problem On the surface, the seven-member MGI team which comprised of Henry Tam and Dana Soiman вЂ“ both current HBS MBA Students, Alex Sartakov вЂ“ a Berklee College of Music student, Dav Clar вЂ“ a MIT graduate student, and Alexander (Sasha) Gimpelson, Igor Tkachenko, and Roman Yakub вЂ“ the MGI /5(1).
Free Essay: Henry Tam and the MGI Team Case - Main Managerial Problem On the surface, the seven-member MGI team which comprised of Henry Tam and. HENRY TAM and the MGI TEAM case overview introductory icebreaker team process team analysis group dynamic strengths/weaknesses of diversity team communication.Download